Showing posts with label Gombis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gombis. Show all posts

Friday, August 19, 2011

Ch.8: “Sit” – The Model of God’s Gracious Plan (2): Ephesians 3:14-21

Paul’s Second Great Prayer
            Now we reach the end of the “Sit” section of Ephesians.  With a prayer (3:14-19) and a concluding benediction (3:20-21) Paul rounds off and brings to a rousing conclusion this amazing part of his letter.
          This prayer draws together many of the words and themes of these first three chapters.
-its Trinitarian structure (vv.14, 16, 17; every section in the letter so far)
-“in heaven and on earth” (v.14; 1:9)
-“riches” (v.16; 1:7; 2:7; 3:8, 10)
-“glory” (v.16; 1:6, 12, 14; 16, 18; 3:13)
-“your inner being” (v.16; 2:15)
-“faith” (v.17; 1:13; 2:8; 3:12)
-“rooted and grounded” (v.17; 2:21)
-“power” (v.18; 1:19, 21; 3:7)
-“to comprehend” (v.18; 1:8-9, 17; 3:5, 9)
-“saints” (v.18; 1:18; 2:19; 3:8)
-“love” (v.19; 1:4; 2:4)
-“fullness” (v.19; 1:23)
          These links bring the full weight of all Paul has said thus far into this concluding prayer.  It’s as if he makes one final gargantuan effort to impress on his readers the critical importance of grasping and internalizing the material in this first section as the background, or, to use computer terminology, as the operating system for God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement.  The mystery of Gods’ gracious plan to sum or gather all things up in Christ, the memory of the victories or “skins” God already has on the wall that assure us that our struggle will not be in vain, and Paul himself, who has just modeled for us how one reads their life, work, and circumstances in light of this mystery and memory are essential elements in the making of God’s subversive counter-revolutionary people.
          Paul’s prayer, which is one sentence in Greek, can be broken out into three parts:  vv.14-15, vv.16-17, and vv. 18-19.  Structurally and theologically, “being rooted and grounded in love” is its center.[1]
          And that’s as it should be.  God chose us in love (1:4).  Raised us alive together with Christ and seated us with him by of his “great love” (2:4ff.).  Paul calls us to live in the love of Christ (5:2, 25; 6:23), and with “an undying love for our Lord Jesus” (6:24).
          Love, as we all know, is one of the most debased words in the English language.  It has been sentimentalized and sexualized beyond recognition.  Nevertheless, we cannot do without it and there is no good surrogate for it.  C. S. Lewis has done us the inestimable service of attempting to rehabilitate the word for us in his The Screwtape Letters.  The following dialogue is from one of the letters sent by Screwtape to his nephew Wormwood, who is his ward in training in the seducing Christians away from their faith.    
“The truth is I slipped by mere carelessness into saying that the Enemy really loves the humans. That, of course, is an impossibility. He is one being, they are distinct from Him. Their good cannot be His. All His talk about Love must be a disguise for something else—He must have some real motive for creating them and taking so much trouble about them. The reason one comes to talk as if He really had this impossible Love is our utter failure to find out that real motive. What does He stand to make out of them? That is the insoluble question. I do not see that it can do any harm to tell you that this very problem was a chief cause of Our Father's quarrel with the Enemy. When the creation of man was first mooted and when, even at that stage, the Enemy freely confessed that he foresaw a certain episode about a cross, Our Father very naturally sought an interview and asked for an explanation. The Enemy gave no reply except to produce the cock-and-bull story about disinterested love which He has been circulating ever since. This Our Father naturally could not accept. He implored the Enemy to lay His cards on the table, and gave Him every opportunity. He admitted that he felt a real anxiety to know the secret; the Enemy replied "I wish with all my heart that you did". It was, I imagine, at this stage in the interview that Our Father's disgust at such an unprovoked lack of confidence caused him to remove himself an infinite distance from the Presence with a suddenness which has given rise to the ridiculous enemy story that he was forcibly thrown out of Heaven. Since then, we have begun to see why our Oppressor was so secretive. His throne depends on the secret. Members of His faction have frequently admitted that if ever we came to understand what He means by Love, the war would be over and we should re-enter Heaven. And there lies the great task. We know that He cannot really love: nobody can: it doesn't make sense. If we could only find out what He is really up to! Hypothesis after hypothesis has been tried, and still we can't find out. Yet we must never lose hope; more and more complicated theories, fuller and fuller collections of data, richer rewards for researchers who make progress, more and more terrible punishments for those who fail—all this, pursued and accelerated to the very end of time, cannot, surely, fail to succeed.”[2]

          Love gets us right to the heart of what God’s counter-revolution against sin, death, and the devil are all about.  There’s nothing more basic, more ultimate, more intimate that God can do for us than to love us in the ways Lewis creatively suggests the devil and his minions cannot understand!  It is this unfathomable love of God “which surpasses knowledge” (v.19) displayed in Jesus Christ and sealed in your hearts through the Holy Spirit that has and will win the day!  And it is this love that has come to us, undeserved to the undeserving, as a gracious gift. 

3:14-15
          On the basis of everything said thus far (“for this reason”), Paul goes to his knees in the presence of God.  This is not the typical prayer posture for Jews.  It makes sense, though, sense Paul ends the last section with an assurance of bold and confident access to the throne of God in Christ.  In the very presence of God, so to speak, Paul goes to his knees, as is only appropriate.  Thus he continues modeling for his churches the truth he teaches.  The access he has announced Paul now lives by exemplifying the reality of this access to God by his posture in prayer. 

          Paul addresses God as “Father” (v.14) in a wider sense than he usually does.  Here God is the Father of all families “in heaven and on earth” (v.15), whatever that exactly means.  Paul does not tell us so it is useless to speculate.  Remember the setting of worship.  This expression of God’s universal, even cosmic, fatherhood is appropriate to this setting – the divine throne room in the heavenly temple.  After all, if Paul has proclaimed Christ as the cosmic Lord over all, humans, the powers, everything, them he surely wants to claim the same scope of lordship for his Father!  Let us take this phrase then as Paul’s way of affirming the same scope of lordship as he affirms for Christ.

3:16-17

          At the heart of this prayer are petitions for strength (v.16) and power (vv.16,17).  This is hardly surprising in light of what Paul has unveiled to these believers as the scope of God’s audacious plan and his equally audacious intention to use them (us!) as his agents of counter-revolution. 

          What is his first petition about though –“strengthened in your inner being” (literally “into the inner human”)?  Seems obvious, doesn’t it?  Our individual inner selves need to be bolstered and emboldened by divine power to carry out our mission of announcing God’s wisdom to the powers (3:10).  Though it seems most natural to modern western readers like us to take it this way, I want to explore another option.[3]

          First, as the literal translation I gave above shows there is no “your” in the original.  Translators supply it because they assume Paul is speaking about the inner life of individuals.  Further, the preposition rendered “in” in the NRSV is actually “into”.  It suggests motion towards rather location in something.

          Secondly, we have already met the term “human” (Greek anthropos) in 2:15 where Paul speaks of the “one new human (or humanity)” as a result of Christ’s work on the cross.  Jew and Gentile have been reconciled into a new people, a new community, a “third race” as some in the early church put it.  Paul again uses this phrase in 4:24 to denote our entrance into the church through baptism and contrasts it with our previous life in the “old humanity (or human)” (4:22).  Paul thinks of the human community as two family lines. Each has a representative head or leader (Rom.5:12-21).  The “old humanity (or human)” is fallen humanity, the line of the “first Adam; the “new humanity (or human)” is redeemed humanity in Christ, the “second or last Adam” (Adam as he should have been).  If in these passages on either side of our text Paul uses “human/humanity” to signify a corporate body, might he not be doing the same here?

That’s the third reason I suggest we take a second look at this passage and not simply assume it means what seems natural to us.   Paul has rather unambiguously been talking about and to the church as a community not about or to the individual believer in this letter up to this point.  A shift of use of this word at this point, especially in a prayer following hard on the heels of a paragraph in which Paul lays out the crucial and central role of the church in God’s plan, seems odd and implausible.

A final point is that in the very next phrase Paul gives us what we try to make this phrase mean:  “and that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith”.  Here we have the notion of Christ indwelling us along with the plural pronoun and noun, “your hearts”.  Here indeed we meet the more familiar truth of each believer’s relationship to Christ.  
          
 What then of Eph.3:16?  Paul uses “inner human (or humanity)” here and not “new human (or humanity)” as in the other passages.  But it may be that he means the same thing as in those other passages.  Paul has just laid out for his his churches God’s plan in which the church plans a key role.  This is, as Gombis rightly calls it, “a massive task”[4].  Thus Paul prays for all his people might need to undertake it.  Therefore we find mention of being “strengthened . . . with power through his Spirit”.  And if the view I am suggesting is correct, the Spirit gives us this needed strength by moving us ever deeper and more inextricably into this hew humanity in Christ, this new reconciled and reconciling community Christ died to bring into being.  This strengthening, then, is spelled out and detailed in the next section of the letter (“Walk,” 4:1-6:9) to which Paul immediately turns.

          But we need not only this incorporation into this new humanity in Christ.  We also need the reality of Christ’s indwelling presence in our hearts.  This new humanity is the crucial and irreplaceable context in which we live out our new life but it is not its beating heart.  That is the living and risen Christ himself with whom are united by faith.  Paul prays that through the indwelling Christ we find ourselves “rooted and grounded in love” (v.17).  Again Paul mixes organic and construction metaphors suggesting both the dynamic potential and the structural strength we discover in the community born of the divine love our enemy just cannot get his head around!

          I have belabored this point because I think it is both crucial and difficult for individualistically-oriented westerners like us to catch hold of.  To summarize, so far Paul is praying for his churches to experience more of the new life they have in and through Christ in the new community he died to birth.  Faith is our connection to the living Christ and this new community.  God’s own love shared with us by Christ, who dwells in our hearts, is the soil in which we grow and are established as the people who will announce God’s wisdom to the powers and forces that keep trying to tyrannize God’s creation!

3:18-19
           
We meet another puzzling matter in the next petition of this prayer.  Not only are life rooted in the new community and in the indwelling Christ necessary, Paul prays for yet another (or perhaps two) resources for us.

          Again he prays for power (v.18).  This time it power “to comprehend, with all the saints, what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge” (vv.18-19).  Most read this as if the “and” were not there and take it that Paul is praying that we grasp the dimensions of Christ’s love.  But the “and” is there in the original and makes it appear Paul is thinking of the dimensions of something as well as the unfathomable love of Christ.  But what are we to know the dimensions of if not of Christ’s love?  Has Paul’s rhetoric simply gotten away from him here?  What can he mean?

          There’s been no lack of suggestions, as you might suspect.  Two seem more plausible to me than the rest and are related.  If a building of some kind is in mind, there are two in scripture that get their dimensions spelled out: the temple (I Ki.6) and the New Jerusalem (Rev.21-22).  Now, the New Jerusalem is cube-shaped like the Holy of Holies, the innermost and most sacred enclosure in the temple.  If also covers the whole of the new creation.  And it has no temple in it (Rev.21:22).  Thus many scholars believe that the city of the New Jerusalem is the temple writ large, the new heavens and earth as the place where the triune God will meet, welcome, and live with his people forever.

          As we have seen, Paul has already described this new humanity of reconciled Jew and Gentile as a “holy temple” (2:21) and “a dwelling place for God” (2:22), and the victorious Christ as “the head over all things for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all” (1:22-23).  It may not be far-fetched then to imagine that Paul had this in mind when he prayed for the church to comprehend these dimensions, the dimensions of God’ ultimate plan, his “eternal purpose” (3:11).  Why he didn’t name the object he was describing we don’t know.  But if it is not love, the New Jerusalem may be the best guess.

          In a more general sense, it may be ever better to take these dimensions as pointing to scope of God’s wisdom.  That’s, after all, what these first three chapters of the letter do – help us to know, understand, grasp, and discern what God is up to and where we fit into his great project of reclaiming and restoring the whole cosmos.  This would certainly include the New Jerusalem idea above but perhaps surpass even that in scope.  Either way, Paul wants us to get hold of what God is up to so we may learn to better align our lives with it.

          And for that, both parts of it (getting hold of it and aligning our lives with it) requires power and community.  Paul asks God to so center us in him that together we can resist the lure of false or partial visions of what God is up to (which the enemy will be aiding and abetting) and enable us to truly become what he has made us to be![5]  We will need each other and all the power of wisdom, insight, and discernment for this crucial growth into the fullness of God’s people.  Thus, Paul requests just this for us.

          That leaves us with love (v.19).  If we can with God’s help grasp the dimensions of his wise and profound plan, we cannot do so with God’s love.  It exceeds, if possible, even God’s wisdom!  Paradoxically, Paul prays that we may “know” the unknowable – this unfathomable depth of passionate commitment that moves God to do what he does, indeed, that makes God who he is.  Obviously this “knowing” is of a different order than that of discursive thought.  We cannot offer reasons and explanations here.  Rather, we can only share with others the overflow of the reality of the love that has called and claimed the whole cosmos as his own.  “That you may be filled with all the fullness of God” (v.19) is Paul’s breath-taking request.  And that “you” is plural – as the new humanity in Christ we will experience and show forth the fullness of this love!

The Benediction (3:20-21)
           
Paul concludes this prayer and indeed this whole first section of the letter with a benediction.  In it he draws together themes of divine power at work in us, the surpassing wisdom of God, Christ, the church, and the universal reach of this good news.  Pretty nice summary of three packed chapters in one short sentence!  Let’s take a brief look at it.

          God is the object of the praise because he is the source of the blessing.  It’s the power of his presence in and with us that surpasses our own limited, finite wisdom and continually surprises us as God “is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine” (v.20).  What a God!

          God’s glory (the signs of his presence) is to be seen in Christ and in the church (v.21).  Paul has laid out in marvelous detail the signs of God’s glorious presence and power in Christ (ch.1-2) for which he deserves the best and richest of our praise.  But this is the only place in the New Testament in which God’s glory “in the church” is mentioned.  It makes sense though, doesn’t it.  Ephesians is the great letter about the church, its primary place and critical role in the outworking of God’s “eternal purpose”.  Where else would we expect to find such a notice?

          What does it mean, though, for God’s glory to be reflected and seen in the church?  It happens by the church

“becoming loving and joyful servants, emulating the cross-bearing of Christ.  That is the only mode of life that draws on God’s power and that demonstrates the triumph of God in the cosmic realm.  Jesus glorified God in his life of dependent weakness, suffering on behalf of others and faithfulness unto death.  The church, therefore, is to take on similar postures in the world, glorifying God by participating in the life that Jesus lives through the church in the world.”[6]

Such praise of glory to God will resound through “all generations” (V.21) and beyond, growing and swelling as the choir of the cosmos learn to sing it better and better throughout the ages of the ages!

We Practice “Sitting” as God’s Subversive Counter-Revolutionary People (6)

Eph.3:14-21
          
 We have seen how this closing prayer and benediction draw together the various themes and emphases of the entire first section of Ephesians.  In these section we have been invited to luxuriate, soak ourselves, internalize everything God has done for us and the cosmos as well as our identity and calling as his people. 

          I think the best ways for us to bring our own reflections on and practice of this “Sitting” is to share Paul’s prayer and benediction again.  This time however we will switch the pronouns to first person singular or our name so we may hear it as Paul’s prayer for each of us.  I have glossed it to reflect some of the understandings we gained from it.  You might record it with this change and then “sit” taking it in silent reflection.  Do this as many times as you need to until you believe this prayer has begun to “sink in”.

“For this reason I bow my knees my knees before the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth takes its name.  I pray that, according to the riches of his glory, he may grant that Lee may be strengthened in his connection to Christ’s new humanity in which he dwells with power through his Spirit, and that Christ may dwell in Lee’s heart through faith, as he is being rooted and grounded in love. I pray that he may have the power to comprehend with all the saints, what is the breadth and length and height and depth of God’s wisdom, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that Lee may be filled with all the fullness of Christ.
Now to him who by the power at work within Lee is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all he can ask or imagine, to him be glory in Lee and the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever.  Amen”

AMEN!!


[1] Snodgrass, Ephesians, 178.
[2]C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters (New York:  Touchstone, 1961), 73-74.  Online at http://members.fortunecity.com/phantom1/books2/c._s._lewis_-_the_screwtape_letters.htm#19.


[3] I owe this way of taking this phrase to Yoder Neufeld, Ephesians, 158-160.
[4]Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians, 133-34.

[5] Yoder Neufeld puts it like this:  “We should thus understand grasping the four dimensions as an invitation to grasp reality fully.  That includes viewing reality from the vista of God’s secret now disclosed in Christ, and also taking hold of reality in the sense of participating in the gathering up of all things in Christ (1:10).” (Ephesians, 161)
[6] Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians, 138.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Ephesians 2 and Healing the Evangelism/Social Justice Divide



          A long-standing and well-known issue dividing American Protestantism throughout the 20th and even into the 21st century is the relation (or lack thereof) of evangelism (understood as the verbal announcement of Jesus’ death and resurrection for human salvation) and social justice (action directed to ameliorating human need and systemic injustice).  The continuum of views ranged from acceptance of one and rejection/ignoring of the other at either end of the spectrum, to asymmetrical relations weighted to the one of the other but acknowledging the legitimacy/necessity of the other, to a separate but equal relation between the two at the center.  We might picture it like this:

EVANGELISM------------EVANGELISM-----------EVANGELISM------------SOCIAL  JUSTICE-----------SOCIAL JUSTICE
                                   social justice             SOCIAL JUSTICE            evangelism

            This division is unbiblical and deeply troublesome for the integrity of the church’s life and witness.  The Bible offers a holistic picture of Christian life and witness that never separates or privileges one over the other.  In fact, Ephesians 2 is perhaps the clearest and most integrative of all the passages that deal with these two issues.

          Unfortunately, the book of Ephesians was a stepchild among the epistles attributed to Paul in the twentieth century.  Only the Catholics paid it substantial attention and then primarily because of its high view of the church.  Higher criticism not only denied Ephesians was or could be from Paul, but reflecting the individualistic character of western culture, further denigrated the letter by dubbing it “early catholic” because of its emphasis on the corporate church.  Conservative scholars fought for Pauline authorship but still failed to hear much of Ephesians because of its tendency to read the New Testament through the lens of the 16th century struggles between Roman Catholics and the nascent Protestants.  The long shadow of those dynamics enabled Protestants to hear Eph.2:1-10 as an affirmation of the Reformation battle cry “justification by faith” but the individualism noted above along with a rather pervasive anti-institutionalism effectively muted the central role of the church in the letter.  This started to change a bit in the late 20th century as “church” emerged as a central category in theology which helped lead to a revaluation of Ephesians in biblical studies.  In our century, Ephesians (whether or not from Paul’s hand) has finally come into light and into its own.  Some even suggest that Ephesians and not Romans is the letter containing the master template of the life of the church in the world (a suggestion I would myself support).

          So, we can now read Ephesians in the holistic and integrative way Paul (as the canonical name of its author) intended.  And when we read Ephesians 2 in this fashion, we find a way of relating evangelism and social justice as two sides of the one great act of God for human and cosmic salvation.  I want to attempt such a reading in the rest of this essay.

          Timothy Gombis[1] has advanced studies in Ephesians by detecting the presence of a “divine warfare pattern” as a key structural feature of the letter.  The elements of this pattern,[2] drawn from the Old Testament, are:

Kingship; Description of Conflict and Victory; Celebration; Victory Shout; Temple-Building; Blessing

Psalm 24 offers a good example:[3]
Kingship (v.1); Description of Conflict and Victory (v.2); Victory Shout (vv.7-10); Assertion of Kingship (vv.7-10); Activity in the Temple (vv.7-10); Celebration (vv.3-6)
           
We see this pattern in Ephesians 1:20-2:22:
Assertion of Christ’s Cosmic lordship (1:20-23); Description of victory over alienation of humanity to God (2:1-10); Description of victory over humanity alienated from each other (2:11-18); the Church as the New Temple; celebrating Christ’s victory[4] (2:19-22).

          It’s the second element, “Description of victory,” I want to focus on here.  Paul has carefully correlated these two descriptions in matching terms.  Each begins with a description of the “old state” in which his readers (both Gentile and Jew) were in (2:1-3/2:11-12), followed by an announcement of God’s decisive act of salvation (2:4-7/2:13-18)[5], and concluding with a declaration of the new state they are in now (2:8-10/2:19-22).

          In each section it is the event of the cross and the resurrection that effects God’s decisive act of salvation.  In the first section God through Christ has overcome the alienation between humanity and himself (the vertical dimension, if you will).  In the second section, through this same Christ God has defeated the forces of division and dehumanization (the horizontal dimension).  If one overlays the horizontal dimension on the vertical dimension an empty cross is formed, which symbol aptly sums up God’s one victory through Jesus’ death and resurrection in its double aspect.  This is the way I propose we read Eph.2:  as a twofold description of the one act of God’s decisive salvation.

          On this reading of Eph.2 salvation encompasses both dimensions; each is integral to it and inextricably bound up with the other.  Witness in word and deed to either dimension is witness to God’s saving work in Christ, which makes it evangelism.  Experience of God’s grace is at one and the same time reconciliation with God and with other human beings in the church.  The former entails decisive changes in our personal lives; the latter in our social, political, and economic lives.  Repentance toward God means turning toward others to forgive and be forgiven, to share and be shared with, to do justice to them and have them do the same for you.  To live into the reality of this “one new humanity” (2:14) is to overcome all that divides us from each other in any and every sphere of life.  As we tell the story of what God has done for humanity in Christ we at the same time are inviting others to come and see what God has done for humanity in Christ in this new community.   

          This brief overview of Eph.2 is decisive, I think, for overcoming a divide that never should have been. We ought never have been asked to choose between sharing the good news of the gospel with others or living the good news in the social, economic, and political realities of life.  The renaissance for Paul’s letter to the Ephesians gives us the opportunity and impetus to relearn the fullness of God’s gospel.  God has saved us by grace through faith and bound us together with each other in one new humanity.  Declaring the faith and living the faith each bear witness to God’s good news.  Every word of invitation to accept the new life God has for us and every act of justice, mercy, compassion, and reconciliation offered to one another is evangelical, that is, having the character of the gospel.  Both belong together, one does not have priority over the other and neither has its fullness as gospel without the other.  In terms of our original diagram, Eph.2 moves us to the middle of that continuum where Evangelism (word) and Social Justice (deed) are, so to speak, the right and left hands of God’s new humanity, the church, where we find the lives God intended for us (2:10) and live together as God’s new temple, the place where God meets the 
world in healing embrace (2:21,22)!

          What God has put together, let us not keep putting asunder!


[1] Timothy G. Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians:  Participating in the Triumph of God (Downers Grove, IL:  InterVarsity Press, 2010).


[2] Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians, 28.
[3] The elements do not have to strictly follow the order of the ideal pattern.
[4] Gombis, Drama of Ephesians, 87-88.
[5] Note the corresponding “but” and “but now” in 2:4 and 2:14.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Ephesians 2:19-22


2:19-22
These final verses of Ephesians 2 serve as the final element of the Divine Warfare pattern we have noticed and bring to a climax the double victory of God Paul wants us to remember.  Paul announces the reversal of status the Gentiles (“you,” v.19) have received through Christ – “no longer strangers and aliens” but rather now “citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God.”  A new people and a new family – the climax and fulfillment of God’s ancient promise to Abraham and through him the whole world.  Jews and Gentiles together under God’s rule and fatherhood; this is the world God dreamed forth in the first place.  Now in Christ, through his cross and resurrection, that dream has been achieved.  It now remains for this people, this family, to implement that victory as they move through the world as God’s subversive counter-revolutionary people.

This new people, this new family, has a foundation and a cornerstone (v.20).  In this construction imagery the “apostles and prophets”[1] of the church constitute its foundation.  Their witness, teaching, and life are unique and fundamental to the church’s identity and character.  Yet even more basic and structurally necessary is the “cornerstone”.  Snodgrass explains the significance of this image: 

“Cornerstones in ancient buildings were the primary load-bearing stones that determined the lines of the building . . . But the cornerstone image gained an importance far beyond its architectural connotations. Isaiah 28:16[2] was significant because it promised security in a time of destruction. Even if a flood came and washed everything away the cornerstone provided a place of refuge.[3]

Paul leaves us, then, with this schematic:
                   Cornerstone:  Jesus Christ
                   Foundation:  Apostles and Prophets
                   Superstructure:  Church members


Perhaps under the influence of this construction imagery, Paul moves on to another image to describe his people:  the temple.  In light of Paul’s consistent use of the “temple” to describe God’s people (1 Cor. 3:9b-11, 16, 17; 6:19-20; 2 Cor.6:16), and in light of Jesus’ clear affirmation that he was now God’s “temple” (John 2:19-22), this usage is rather more than an image – it is a description of reality.  Jesus and his people are now the temple – the place of God’s presence and glory, the place where earth and heaven come together, where humanity meets God and where God enters into his creation.[4]
      
    As earlier in this chapter (2:5-6), Paul uses another series of three words with the preposition sun (“together with”).  Here we find “fellow citizen” (v.19), “joined together” (v.21), “build together” (v.22).  Whereas the first set of these three sun-words stressed our unity with Christ in his resurrection and victory, this present set of three sun-words stresses our unity with each other as God’s people.

The temple was always meant to be, as Jesus put it, “a house of prayer for all the nations” (Mk.11:17).  Yet this purpose was continually frustrated by Israel’s disobedience.  The temple became a bastion of Israelite nationalism and exclusivism which ultimately brought down God’s judgment upon it.  The new temple which is and is in Jesus is everything that God intended the temple to be:  a multicultural community of praise and practice of the presence of God built on Jesus Christ.  The radicality of this claim and Paul’s making it is evident when we remember that it is just around the time of this letter that Jews and Syrians in Caesarea were slaughtering each other and that no one else held a view of such a multicultural temple.[5]

The last two verses both began with “in him,” that is, Christ.  In v.21 “the whole structure” of this new temple is “built together” (Jews and Gentiles united).  In a characteristic switch of metaphors Paul tells us that this building “grows” into the new temple of God.  Likely this switch of metaphors is occasioned by Paul’s desire to assert that this temple both is as an act of God in Christ (“built together” by God) and at the same time is becoming (“grows”) as a living organism what it already is.[6]  This is consistent with Paul’s overall approach with is framed by just this “already – not yet”/”become what you already are” view of Christian existence.

“In him,” Paul assures the Gentiles “you” are being joined to the Jews into a “dwelling place for God.”  This is the work of God the Holy Spirit.  The phrase here could mean “in spirit” or “spiritually” (as in the NRSV).  However, the parallelism of this phrase with “in the Lord” (v.21) and the two “in him” (Christ) phrases (vv.21-22) along with Paul’s evident Trinitarian view of the person and work of God that we have already noticed makes me think he is speaking here of the work of the Holy Spirit in building the new temple.[7]

In the beginning God placed Adam and Eve in a garden where he “walked and talked” with them.  What does the Bible call the place where God speaks and meets with his people?  The temple!

God appointed our first parents protectors and nurturers of this garden which he intended them to spread to all the rest of the then uninhabited creation.  That means the entire earth was to become a “temple” filled with presence of God and communion of his people with him.  After humanity fell into sin and God called Abraham and Sarah, a new Adam and Eve, to carry out his plan to reclaim and restore his creatures and creation.  From their family came the people God rescued out of Egypt in the Exodus.  God was present to this people in their journeying in the wilderness and their settling in the land of promise in, first, the Tabernacle (a mobile tent of worship) and, then, the temple in Jerusalem. 

The failure of Israel and its temple to prove faithful mediators or God’s presence and blessing to the world brought divine judgment on both.  That judgment, however, in the person of Jesus Christ, the one faithful Israelite, brought not only the end and destruction of the temple in Jerusalem, but, as Paul says here in Ephesians 2, laid the “cornerstone” of the new temple of God by his death and resurrection.  This new temple, however, is and is in a person, the risen and triumphant Christ.  He is now the “place” where God and humanity meet and commune.  And his people, who are “in him,” are part of this new temple as well.

As this Christ-Temple movement spread throughout the world of the 1st century and the wider world throughout the centuries since, the temple of God has extended its boundaries and extent.  In the end, according to John the Seer in Revelation, this complete and perfect people of God will come down from heaven as a city, the New Jerusalem.  This is a peculiar city however.  Its shape as a cube matches only one other space in the Bible – the Holy of Holies, the innermost and most sacred part of the temple.  John is telling us that redeemed humanity will be a “Holy of Holies,” a place of intimate and unbroken  communication, communion, and community with God.  And since this city covers the whole of the new creation, God’s dream to have a world full of his glory and presence is realized.  The whole earth has become the temple of the Lord.

There is no temple in the New Jerusalem (Rev.21:22).  The city itself is the temple.    And we – Jews and Gentiles together in Christ – are, and are growing into, this very temple in which God will dwell with his people in his new creation. 

Thus Paul displays the grounds on which we who have come to faith – white-hot passion for and conviction of the Lordship of Christ – ought to channel that conviction into a long-term commitment to the cause of God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement.

Paul refers to Psalm 110:1 to indicate Jesus’ victory over all God’s enemies in his theme statement in 1:22.  In the Divine Warfare pattern the final element is the victor’s celebration at the temple.  Paul fills out this pattern by closing his narration of God’s decisive victories, or better, his one two-sided victory over sin and death in relation to God on the one hand, and over social division and destructiveness on the other by ending up at the temple.  Only this time, the temple is, as we have seen, not a material structure to which people come but rather a human organism in which one lives. 

And this human temple in which God now dwells in the Spirit is the evidence and offer of salvation to the world.  Thus, Gombis is justified when he claims:

“All of this points to how important it is that the church truly embodies the            life of God on earth.  The church must be faithful to its call because it stands          as the monument to the triumph of God over Satan and the powers of evil.              If the church does not faithfully embody God’s love in Christ, then God’s           victory is diminished.  We must celebrate our new identifies, walking in good      deeds rather than in patterns that formerly enslaved us.  And we must cultivate communities of restoration and reconciliation where there has been alienation, bitterness, and division.  These sorts of pursuits are not merely to be part of our doctrinal statements or our official documents but must be our urgent priorities.”[8]


[1] Paul’s placing of prophets after apostles suggests he has the prophets of the early church rather than Old Testament prophets in mind.
[2]A key Old Testament text that was surely in Paul’s mind in using this kind of imagery (see 1 Pet.2:6).
[3] Snodgrass, Ephesians, 138-39.
[4] See Nicholas Perrin, Jesus the Temple (Grand Rapids, MI:  Baker Academic, 2010).
[5] Keener, Craig S.  The IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament (Downers Grove, IL:  InterVarsity Academic, 1994)
[6] This means growth in both the numbers and the character of this new temple.
[7] The lack of a definite article, that is no “the” in front of “spirit,” is no barrier to this view.  Definite nouns frequently occur without the definite article.
[8] Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians, 106.