Thursday, July 28, 2011

Ephesians 3:8-13


3:8-13
          Thus far Paul has modeled for his comrades in God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement how to read their lives in light of their guiding convictions, their priorities.   Because the power of God the Divine Warrior is at work in him and his circumstances, Paul does not allow apparently negative situations dissuade him from his calling or dissipate his passion or dilute his faith.  This is not, as we have seen, pollyana-ish positive thinking that engages in denial of or refusal to face reality.  It is an intentional choice to embrace God’s way of being in this world.

-It is the theology of the cross.[1]
-It is the life of Jesus at work in and through Paul.[2]   
-It is the crucifixion-resurrection dynamic in full gear. 
-It is grace.

          And grace is where Paul picks up in this new paragraph:  “Although I am the very least of all the saints, this grace was given to me . . .” (v.8).  Under the rubric of grace there is a good deal of overlap with the preceding paragraph but it is not redundant.  Paul adds texture here to model he provides for his churches.

“Least of all the saints” – what does Paul mean by this?  Is it merely rhetorical overkill to highlight God’s grace?  Or is there something more?  I believe the latter is the case.  God’s grace is highlighted to be sure.  Paul could never quite forget that as a former persecuter of the church, he was perhaps the most unlikely believer and, as he puts it here, “least of all the saints”.  But I think there’s even more here than that.  Being the “least of all the saints” alludes to the servant posture Jesus admonishes disciples to adopt (Jn.13:1-17).  “But many who are first shall be last, the last shall be first” (Mk.10:31), he said.  Jesus here turns the normal “pecking order” on its head.  Those who serve others and give themselves up for Jesus’ sake are the ones who are fit to share in the work of God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement.  I think that’s what Paul is ultimately pointing toward here.  He has accepted that he is the “least of all the saints” and he ministers from that place (I am convinced he truly believes this; it is not manipulative rhetoric as it too often is among us!).  Is this not part of what he is modeling here for his readers to emulate?

The following words from the opening prayer in “The Way Down is the Way Up[3] capture this perspective well.

“Lord, high and holy, meek and lowly,
You have brought me to the valley of vision,
where I live in the depths, but see you in the heights;
hemmed in by mountains of sin I behold your glory.
Let me learn by paradox
that the way down is the way up,
that to be low is to be high,
that the broken heart is the healed heart,
that the contrite spirit is the rejoicing spirit,
that the repenting soul is the victorious soul,
that to have nothing is to possess all,
that to bear the cross is to wear the crown,
that to give is to receive,
that the valley is the place of vision.
Lord, in the daytime stars can be seen from deepest wells,
and the deeper the wells the brighter your stars shine;
Let me find your light in my darkness,
your life in my death,
your joy in my sorrow,
your grace in my sin,
your riches in my poverty,
your glory in my valley.”

Thus, paradoxically, God has given this Paul the privilege and commission to be the primary mover of the Gentile mission and the one who announces the “mystery” of God’s heretofore unrevealed plan to bring Jew and Gentile together in Christ in one body as a new humanity.

At this point another aspect of the modeling Paul practices comes to the fore.  Notice how he shifts the emphasis from himself and his calling to the church.  All of his work leads finally to the church.  It’s the church, not Paul, or anyone else, that stands at the center of God’s “eternal purpose” (v.11) as the new humanity in Christ (2:11-22) and body of Christ (4:15-16).  

Even Paul, the great apostle to the Gentiles, is de-centered as he engages God’s call to service.  And he willingly accepts and confesses such as God’s will for him.  His task is to take the news of God’s glad incorporation of the Gentiles into his people.  The “boundless riches of Christ” (v.8) translates into a boundless (i.e. boundary-free) church with members from all “boundaries” present together as one in Christ. 

Paul further specifies that a part of his task is to make it clear to the whole world (“everyone,” v.9) what God the creator’s (v.9) ultimate plan and purpose are (the great “mystery”; 1:9-10).  Paul shares and even takes the lead in God’s work of gathering this great multiethnic, multilingual body of people together, but in so doing he de-centers himself.  The emphasis shifts from the work of gathering (though of course it continues on) to the gathered community.  They are the goal of Paul’s work and the result of his labors.  Paul does what he does so the church may then do what God has called it to do.  And it to that Paul turns in v.10.

“Through the church,” he writes, “the wisdom of God in its rich variety” is to be made known to the “rulers and authorities in the heavenly places” (v.10).  Paul then declares this “in accordance with the eternal purpose” of God which he has enacted in Christ (v.11).  Wow!  We need to spend a little time unpacking this!

Imagine (because I know you’ve never actually seen it) a church whose vision/mission/core values/whatever statement read:  “We are here to make the full panoply of God’s wisdom known to the powers of this world.”  What would this mean?[4] 

Whatever this means, it mean in the first place that this is what the church (not the individual believer) is to do.  Whatever this is that God intends to do, he intends to do it through the church – this body of Jew and Gentile bound together by the cross of Christ.  God works through his people. 

That’s a hard one for us North Americans to get our hearts around.  I heard a quip the other day to the effect that:  Americans agree on only one thing and that is to never be attached to anyone else.  When it comes down to it we see ourselves as billiard balls, separate, self-sufficient in ourselves, rolling around the big billiard table of life occasionally bumping into other balls but remaining essentially unchanged by these encounters. 

The Bible, on the other hand, sees human beings like those models of molecules we used to make in high school out of Styrofoam balls and pipe cleaners.  Here our connections with each other and the networks of relationships formed by those connections define our humanity.  In other words, we can almost say we are our relationships.  In my tradition’s A Brief Statement of Faith we read:

“In sovereign love God created the world good
and makes everyone equally in God’s image
male and female, of every race and people,
to live as one community.”[5]

Ironically, individuality, that sense of who we are as the unique image-bearers God, comes to us only through community.  Only in the give and take, loving and living, serving and searching, worshiping and witnessing together as a family, do we discover who we truly are and shall be.

That’s the biblical context, then, in which Paul’s astonishing claim about the church takes place here.  We sort of have to learn to look at things a bit differently than we usually do, look cock-eyed, as it were, to see with Paul what he is getting after.

This body, community, church, then is to make known God’s “wisdom” in all its hues and colors (think of a male peacock’s tail fanned out).  Wisdom is in essence living in sync with, or with the grain of, God’s world.  In a world radically out of sync or living against the grain of God’s world, well, you can see that there will be conflict and tension.  The church will be the focal point or lightning rod for much of this struggle, as Jesus was himself (Jn.15:18-21). 

Can we say more about this wisdom the church announces to the powers of the world?  We can say, first, that the church knows (or should know) what God is up to in the world, the “mystery” at the heart of the world (1:9-10).  This “open secret”[6] is now to be made known to all God’s creation.  Thus the church ought to shape its identity and ministry in light of this “mystery” which it embodies.

Second, this divine wisdom comes in a “rich variety”.  It is multidimensional, covers all areas of life, comprehensively “schools” God’s people in living in sync with his will and way for us, and enables the visibility and practices of credible witness.  As a good Jew Paul grew up with this vision of divine wisdom as Moses announced it to Israel in Deuteronomy
4:5-8:
See, just as the Lord my God has charged me, I now teach you statutes and ordinances for you to observe in the land that you are about to enter and occupy.  You must observe them diligently, for this will show your wisdom and discernment to the peoples, who, when they hear all these statutes, will say, ‘Surely this great nation is a wise and discerning people!’   For what other great nation has a god so near to it as the Lord our God is whenever we call to him?  And what other great nation has statutes and ordinances as just as this entire law that I am setting before you today?”

From the evidence within Ephesians we can identify with Yoder Neufeld the following three areas where this wisdom is needed.[7]

Disobedience to God (2:1-10);
Divisions within the human community (2:11-22); and
Darkness of a culture sunk in lawlessness, greed, and falsehood (4:15-5:21).

These areas are obviously not exhaustive or definitive.  The church in every time and place and in each cultural setting needs to discern the particular places and practices in which God’s wisdom must be demonstrated.

In the third place, our audience is “the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places”.  This undoubtedly is the strangest part of this verse to our modern western ears.  What in the world is this all about?  These figures, which I discussed in the introduction, reside “in the heavenly places”.  I suggested earlier that this cosmological imagery represents the place of Christ’s victory (1:3, 20; 2:6).  This setting already tells us that we are in the reality established by the Divine Warrior’s victory over these very powers.

These powers are probably best understood as suprahuman creatures charged to maintain the structures and conditions in which humanity lives, part of the creational substructure, as it were, of human life.  They rebelled against God and turned their mandate to maintain the conditions for humanity into a grab for mastery over them.  This resulted in warped conditions for human life, and the feeling of helplessness we often feel before the nameless “they” that seem to thwart our freedom and conspire against our flourishing.[8]

This warping takes place on every level of human existence:  economic, cultural, political, and religious.  The church, then, must make known the wisdom of God on every level of human existence.  In ch.2 Paul begins this work by undercutting the religious and social powers active in the world.  The church announces to the powers of distorted religion that its strategy of inducing us to remake “God” in our own image and using “religion” to enslave humanity under a load of guilt and obligation is over.  The true and living God has raised us from death to new life in and with the victorious Christ.  Faith rather than religion is our new reality and in faith we discover freedom from forgiveness and new power for obedience; guilt and obligation are bad and distant memories of our slavery under “religion”.

Likewise, in the second half of ch.2 Paul narrates how God in Christ has freed us from the tyranny of division, all kinds of division on any and every level of life – economic, social, political and so on.  The church through the quality of its own life and its witness to the wider world makes known to the powers of division that their day is over, their power bankrupt, and their demise certain.

Elsewhere[9] I have described the church as a sign, sacrament, and steward of God’s kingdom (adapting the categories of Lesslie Newbigin).  As the church lives into this identity – pointing to God’s kingdom, embodying the reality of the kingdom so that it may be seen, handled, and heard (1 Jn.1:1), and implementing the reality of the kingdom – it will necessarily be announcing God’s wisdom and truth to the folly and falsehood of the “world according the rulers and authorities”.  Christ’s victory won at the cross and in the resurrection takes on flesh and blood as the church fulfills this, it’s God-given vocation.

Now, if you see a church mission statement that reads “We are here to make the full panoply of God’s wisdom known to the powers of this world,” you will know both what it means and why it is perhaps the most appropriate such statement we have!

All this is rooted in the “eternal purpose” (v.11) of God the Divine Warrior who won the victory “Christ Jesus.”  And in him, Jew and Gentile together are ushered into the very presence of God whose “eternal purpose” is just this – that his creatures and he may live together in communication, communion, and community throughout eternity in God’s new creation.  This is why Paul concludes this paragraph encouraging his churches to not misread his sufferings, his imprisonment.  They are neither his shame nor a sign of the gospel’s defeat but rather God’s victory at work and Paul’s readers’ “glory” (v.13).


[1] "A theologian of glory calls evil good and good evil. A theologian of the cross calls the thing what it actually is." Martin Luther, cited in Douglas John Hall. The Cross in Our Context: Jesus and the Suffering World (Kindle Locations 243-244). Kindle Edition.

[2] 2 Cor.4:7-12.
[3] http://trevinwax.com/2011/07/24/the-way-down-is-the-way-up/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wordpress%2Ftrevinwax+%28Kingdom+People%29
[4] That we cannot envision using this as a church’s mission statement or what it might mean if we did suggests why the church is in difficulty in our country and why we so need the teaching of this letter.
[5] “A Brief Statement of Faith,” The Book of Confessions,  10.3, ll.29-32.
[6] Lesslie Newbigin, The Open Secret
[7] Yoder Neufeld, Ephesians, 358.
[8]A rough paraphrase of Miroslav Volf’s description:  “all pervasive low-intensity evil . . ., the interiority of warped institutions, structures, and systems . . . under which many suffer but for which no one is responsible and about which all complain but no one can target.”  Exclusion and Embrace (Nashville:  Abingdon Press, 1996), 87.

[9] Lee Wyatt, The Incredible Shrinking Gospel:  The Crisis of Evangelism in the 21st Century (forthcoming ebook)

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Ch.7: “Sit” – The Model of God’s Gracious Plan (1): Ephesians 3:1-13


Summary of Eph.3

The last aspect for our reflection and internalization as we “Sit” in God’s gracious presence is the third of our five “M’s” in Ephesians: a model. The mystery of God’s gracious plan has kindled in us a white-hot faith. The memory of God’s great and climactic twofold defeat of sin and death and division has channeled that white-hot faith into an enduring commitment to God’s cause, his subversive counter-revolutionary movement. Here Paul responds to our need for a model, an embodiment of living out this faith in the movement God has called us to participate in. This correlates well with the third critical aspect all movements need: contagious relationships. Paul narrates his story in vv.1-13 and then offers a beautiful prayer that his churches be enabled to join him in living out this story in vv.14-21.

Model

An apostle like Paul, who covered large areas in his work, could not be present at every place he was needed at any one time. In the first century, a crucial and effective way to establish one’s presence with a group was to send a letter to be read through a appointed delegate to the group. Our letter, which, as we have seen, Paul probably sent as a circular a number of different churches in Asia Minor, serves as his presence with these churches, mediating his relationship with them. Thus he puts himself forward as model for his readers. As Gombis puts it, Paul “demonstrates how God’s triumph in Christ is performed in a person’s life.” We could perhaps use the contemporary buzz-word “mentor” for Paul’s role here but all in all the word model serves best here.

3:1-7

Paul shifts the spotlight to himself and his role in “the commission of God’s grace” (v.2) that he was given by the emphatic position he gives the pronoun “I” in the Greek (“I Paul,” v.1).

But in a surprising turn he declares himself a “prisoner of/for Christ Jesus” (either translation is possible). Does Paul see himself metaphorically imprisoned to Jesus and his purposes and mission? Or is he literally describing his life-situation – he is actually in prison? As we have seen before, there is no reason to have to choose one of the other. Why could Paul not be playing on both senses of “prisoner”? He is Caesar’s prisoner only because he is Christ’s prisoner. I think this is exactly what he is doing.

And I think he does this because his actual life-situation as a prisoner of Caesar needs to be re-framed for his readers. If God has been so gloriously victorious as Paul has just claimed, why is he imprisoned? How has divine victory benefitted him? According to the logic of the Greco-Roman world of his time, such a situation would mean that the deities of Rome were superior to and had defeated Israel’s God. Thus, Paul must re-frame his circumstances in light of God’s purposes.

That’s why I believe he intends us to read his “of/for” phrase in both ways. As I put it earlier, Paul claims he is Caesar’s prisoner only because he is first and foremost Christ’s prisoner. “This is the reason,” he begins his re-framing. Not only is this not a loss or defeat for God or Paul. On the contrary, it is the outworking of Paul’s being bound to Christ Jesus (the metaphorical sense of the phrase) that he is bound over in a Roman prison (the literal sense). This is part of the “commission” Paul received from God as the strategy for his implementing the “mystery” of the inclusion of the Gentiles in the church as the centerpiece of his plan to “gather up all things in Christ” (1:10)!

Paul is in prison, then, not by Caesar’s will but by God’s will; and he is there as prisoner of both “for the sake of you Gentiles.” There is no reason, then, for Paul’s readers to be disquieted or depressed by his residence in a Roman cell. He is just where he needs to be. Like David before Goliath, Paul refuses to foreclose on God’s penchant for using unlikely people who simply make themselves available to be used for God’s glory. rides the wave of the future, God’s future. This is a new day. The hidden purpose of his plan (the “mystery”) has now been revealed by the Spirit (v.5) and is being worked out in and through Christ. The victory has been won. Like Paul, God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement, need only move forward in that confidence, making themselves available to the Spirit to implement the mystery that is at the very heart of human and divine longing.

For the third time in as many chapters, Paul brings out a triad of sun-words to profile God’s people in light of what God has done for them. I’ve gathered them in the table below. The first set in 2:5-6 speaks to God’s binding us together with Christ in his resurrection and exaltation. The second set in 2:19-22 speaks to God binding us together with each other (Jew and Gentile). The final set here in 3:6 speaks to the result of God’s work for us. In a way each of these expressions picks up on crucial notes from earlier sections: “fellow-heirs” picks up the emphasis on inheritance in 1:3-14, “members of the same body” picks up similar language from 2:11-22, and “sharers in the promise” echoes the mention of hope in 1:15-23. In this way Paul draws the main threads of his keynotes in this “Sit” section together. We might paraphrase it like this: We are together, across all lines of division and separation, living proof that God’s promises are true and can be trusted, that Jesus Christ is Lord of all and is even now in process of gathering all things to himself. That is who we are and what we about in this world – this is our gospel (v.6), the revelation of the mystery of God’s gracious intentions for all creation (vv.3-5).

Eph. 2:5-6 Eph. 2:19-22 Eph. 3:6
alive together with Christ citizens with the saints fellow-heirs
raised us up with him joined together members of the same body
seated us with him built together sharers in the promise

Despite many translations which put v.7 with the next paragraph (NRSV, NIV), grammatically and conceptually it belongs with the first paragraph. Paul’s self-description has moved from “prisoner” (v.1; both metaphorical and literal) to one who implements (or stewards) God’s plan (v.2) to “servant” of the gospel (v.7). From the intentional ambiguity of the first description Paul gradually dissolves that ambiguity by casting himself as right in the center of God’s plan for him and for his work. Thus his readers should not be dismayed that he is incarcerated but rejoice with him that even in this God’s plan is unfolding “by the working of his power” (allusion to God’s resurrection power in 1:19).

We Practice “Sitting” as God’s Subversive Counter-Revolutionary People (4)
Ephesians 3:1-7

Paul has and will continue to hammer away at the audacity and urgency of God’s plan to bring together Jew and Gentile (that all of us, folks!) in one harmonious and interdependent community. Further, this has always been God’s intention, his dream in creating this world and us, its inhabitants. In these first three chapters of this letter Paul has laid this before us for our reflection and prayer. In the many and varied ways and images he has used the Apostle has confronted us with the centrality of Jesus Christ not only as the ultimate gathering point for all things (1:10) but even now, crucially, the victor over the powers of sin, evil, and death, who offered his life on the cross as a sacrifice that creates peace between divided and fractured humanity. In him, the gathering process becomes visible as Jew and Gentile find peace together in commitment to this Jesus and his people. This community, peace-ed together by Jesus, becomes the vehicle through whom the good news of Jesus’ victory is declared and demonstrated to those yet unaware of or uncommitted to this gospel. Issues of peace in every dimension of life that affects human and creational well-being will be perpetual matters of central concern for this community.

Nearly forty-five years ago my tradition, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) wrote a confession, “The Confession of 1967”. Its main theme was reconciliation and it included a section on “Reconciliation in Society”. Even today, four and a half decades later, these sections sound very contemporary. Others matters that have become issues since then might be added (for example, issues of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered persons). Nevertheless, they stand as a representative display of the kinds of issues that break and threaten the unity we are to have in Christ. I’ve reproduced these sections here for your reflection. As you read them, bear in mind Paul’s message in these first three chapters of Ephesians. Bring together what you have heard so far from Paul with issues from these sections of the “Confession of 1967” (the paragraph numbers are from the PCUSA’s Book of Confessions) that resonate with you and imagine a world free of such blights and what God might be calling you and your church to do as part of his subversive counter-revolutionary movement.

9.43 In each time and place, there are particular problems and crises through which God calls the church to act. The church, guided by the Spirit, humbled by its own complicity and instructed by all attainable knowledge, seeks to discern the will of God and learn how to obey in these concrete situations. The following are particularly urgent at the present time.

9.44 a. God has created the peoples of the earth to be one universal family. In his reconciling love, God overcomes the barriers between sisters and brothers and breaks down every form of discrimination based on racial or ethnic difference, real or imaginary. The church is called to bring all people to receive and uphold one another as persons in all relationships of life: in employment, housing, education, leisure, marriage, family, church, and the exercise of political rights. Therefore, the church labors for the abolition of all racial discrimination and ministers to those injured by it. Congregations, individuals, or groups of Christians who exclude, dominate, or patronize others, however subtly, resist the Spirit of God and bring contempt on the faith which they profess.

9.45 b. God’s reconciliation in Jesus Christ is the ground of the peace, justice, and freedom among nations which all powers of government are called to serve and defend. The church, in its own life, is called to practice the forgiveness of enemies and to commend to the nations as practical politics the search for cooperation and peace. This search requires that the nations pursue fresh and responsible relations across every line of conflict, even at risk to national security, to reduce areas of strife and to broaden international understanding. Reconciliation among nations becomes peculiarly urgent as countries develop nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, diverting human power and resources from constructive uses and risking the annihilation of humankind. Although nations may serve God’s purposes in history, the church which identifies the sovereignty of any one nation or any one way of life with the cause of God denies the Lordship of Christ and betrays its calling.

9.46 c. The reconciliation of humankind102 t h rough Jesus Christ makes it plain that enslaving poverty in a world of abundance is an intolerable violation of God’s good creation. Because Jesus identified himself with the needy and exploited, the cause of the world’s poor is the cause of his disciples. The church cannot condone poverty, whether it is the product of unjust social structures, exploitation of the defenseless, lack of national resources, absence of technological understanding, or rapid expansion of populations. The church calls all people to use their abilities, their possessions, and the fruits of technology as gifts entrusted to them by God for the maintenance of their families and the advancement of the common welfare. It encourages those forces in human society that raise hopes for better conditions and provide people with opportunity for a decent living. A church that is indifferent to poverty, or evades responsibility in economic affairs, or is open to one social class only, or expects gratitude for its beneficence makes a mockery of reconciliation and offers no acceptable worship to God.

9.47 d. The relationship between man and woman exemplifies in a basic way God’s ordering of the interpersonal life for which God created humankind. Anarchy in sexual relationships is a symptom of alienation from God, neighbors, and self. Perennial confusion about the meaning of sex has been aggravated in our day by the availability of new means for birth control and the treatment of infection, by the pressures of urbanization, by the exploitation of sexual symbols in mass communication, and by world overpopulation. The church, as the household of God, is called to lead people out of this alienation into the responsible freedom of the new life in Christ. Reconciled to God, people have joy in and respect for their own humanity and that of other persons; a man and woman are enabled to marry, to commit themselves to a mutually shared life, and to respond to each other in sensitive and lifelong concern; parents receive the grace to care for children in love and to nurture their individuality. The church comes under the judgment of God and invites rejection by society when it fails to lead men and women into the full meaning of life together, or withholds the compassion of Christ from those caught in the moral confusion of our time.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

We Practice “Sitting” as God’s Subversive Counter-Revolutionary People (3): Eph.2:11-22



Eph.2:11-22

          As we “sit” under the cascading outpouring of God’s grace and goodness as narrated by Paul we come to realize how lavishly God loves us.  Such love as displayed in chs.1-2 of Ephesians is what alone catalyzes white-hot faith in us and consolidates it into an ongoing commitment to God’s great subversive counter-revolutionary movement against the revolution of sin against God and its outworkings in the attitudes, practices, institutions, and policies in the world.  These latter define for us what it means to be “human” and live “humanely” in this fallen world of ours.  God’s subversive counter-revolutionary movement (aka “church”) contests these definitions, unmasks their inhumanity and violence, and models God’s truly human way of living.  We must be thoroughly saturated and soaked in God’s way and will for us and gifts and graces to us to be effective agents of his counter-revolution.  Thus we continue to “sit” and in wonder and gratitude take in what God has done for and given to us.

          My remarks here will cluster around two central themes of this section:  peace and temple.

1.    Remember, peace is ours as gift to be maintained not a goal to strive for.

Paul’s ethic is, as we have seen, rooted in a “become what you already are” pattern.  Thomas Merton captures this when he writes:  We are already one. But we imagine that we are not. And what we have to recover is our original unity. What we have to be is what we are”.[1]  Paul will later exhort his readers to “maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (4:3).  We are gifted with peace, who is Christ himself (2:14).  This unattainable grace is given to us; we have only to maintain it, not create it.  This is a precious learning in times of strife and conflict (which will surely beset us from time to time).

2.    Peace is the English translation of the Greek word which translates the great Hebrew word “Shalom”.  “Shalom” however, means much more than absence of conflict.  It points to God’s dream for a world of abundance, generosity, and wellbeing for all on every level of life.  Given that this “Shalom” is God’s gift to us in Christ, how might we “maintain” it as Paul exhorts?  
Here are some images to stimulate your imagination.  Which appeal most to you?  Which do you find most challenging?  We might, for instance,

·         Scatter shalom – as in seeds; small packets of reproductive potential; dried parcels of life
·         Raise shalom – as with children; think of mothers throughout all times and places in history
·         Nurture / cultivate shalom – like a gardener tending seedlings, a farmer growing a crop, or any of us caring for our house plants
·         Kindle shalom – as a fire: it sparks, burns, catches, consumes; alive and too hot to touch
·         Act out shalom – like a drama or a protest; action/praxis; from rehearsal to proclamation
·         Tell / testify / witness to shalom – telling stories of what we have seen and heard; shout and sing of what we have experienced
·         Celebrate shalom – with eagerness, joy, gratitude, wanting to share, re-minding ourselves and others that it’s life-giving and inviting
·         Desire shalom – so it becomes the thing we want more than anything else
·         Yearn for shalom – longing & hope; lament & aspiration, fervent prayer and striving
·         Work for shalom – effort, toil, struggle, “a long obedience in the same direction” (Eugene Peterson)
·         Practice shalom – patient, persistent, repeated behaviours; dedication because you don’t usually get it right the first time (or any time)
·         Experience shalom – with humility, because we too need to find wholeness and healing for our own brokenness and wounds
·         Embrace shalom – like a hug that offers welcome, hospitality; arms entwined together
·         Struggle for shalom – vigorous engagement, perhaps even conflict; combat / challenge / try to overcome ignorance, hate, apathy, fear, self-righteousness, pride
·         Risk shalom – sacrifice, wager/gamble; never a sure thing, like the radical contingency of history that is still in the making
·         Think / study shalom – reflect, critique, examine, contemplate, analyze, strive to understand how it works and what helps it to flourish
·         Wait for shalom – never complete in our lifetime; it is ultimately God’s to create; will only fully come to fruition at the redemption of all creation
·         Seek shalom – like a treasure that has been lost; look for it, pay attention, watch very closely, discern in order to see what others can’t or won’t
·         Live shalom – be the change, make it integral to the way you live your life; be a living, breathing presence of shalom in the world
·         Imagine shalom – because we haven’t even begun to dream of all the possibilities, we need creative new ideas, transformed minds, and energized imaginations
·         Receive and share shalom – like a gift, given with the intent that it be passed along; a reminder that we can’t make it happen apart from God’s radical grace and generosity[2]

3.    Christ himself is our peace and transforms the cross into a peace-making instrument.

Yoder Neufeld offers wise words in this regard:
“In the first century, the cross had the same meaning that torture chambers,      firing squads, electric chairs, gas chambers, and lethal injections have for us     today.  Though early Christians might have heard of the emperor being called peacemaker, Caesar typically made ‘peace’ by putting his enemies (including    Jesus!) on the cross … The cosmic Peacemaker of our text dwarfs Caesar in        might and power (1:22).  But his way of dealing with hostile and unruly          subjects is to offer up his own life, his own body (members beware!), for the        sake of the reconciliation of humanity to each other and to God.”[3]

We might do well to mull this passage over several times before moving on.

4.    “Come to the Table”

I encouraged us to “Look to the Water” in the last section drawing on the baptismal imagery of that part of the letter (2:1-10).  Here, drawing on the imagery of Christ offering himself (as both priest and sacrifice) for us and our peace and unity – “in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall . . . between us” (2:14) – I encourage us to reflect on and avail ourselves of the other great sacramental mystery – the Eucharist.  Thus, “Come to the Table”!

          The Eucharist is the great sacrament of the peace won for by Christ and given to us by God.  I don’t want to get into sacramental theology here.  But I do want to call attention to a practice you may or may not experience in your church’s celebration of the Eucharist but which may well prove vital and worth including in your Eucharistic celebration if it is not already there.  I refer to the practice of what we Presbyterians call “Passing the Peace of Christ” to one another.  It is often used in the Eucharistic liturgy.  Jason Goroncy draws on little-known history and offers such wise reflection that I will quote him at length here.

“So to return to the question with which we began: What does it mean to share Christ’s peace with each other? For many, the exchanging of the sign of peace can be embarrassing and awkward. We might offer a peck on the cheek to members of our family or to friends, but strangers are more likely to receive a distant nod or a polite handshake. But it was not always so.

“During the Middle Ages the kiss of peace was a solemn moment of reconciliation in which social conflicts were resolved. The community was restored to charity before Holy Communion could be received. One of the earliest preaching missions entrusted to the Dominicans and Franciscans was what was called ‘The Great Devotion’ of 1233. Northern Italian cities were torn apart by division which in some cases amounted to civil war. And the climax of the preaching was the ritual exchange of the kiss of peace between enemies. Here at the table – in the eating of one loaf and the drinking of one cup – was enacted the reconciliation made real in Christ.

“And here at the table, we confess that we Christians have often been unimpressive witnesses to Christ’s peace. Our history is marked by aggression, intolerance, rivalry and persecution. These days we usually avoid the extremes of some early Christians, rarely poisoning each other’s chalices or arranging ambushes of our opponents. But we still tend to succumb to the dominant ethos of our competitive and aggressive society, though rarely with the clarity of a First World War general who instructed his chaplain that he wanted a bloodthirsty sermon next Sunday ‘and would not have any texts from the New Testament’.

“I want to suggest that when we offer each other a sign of peace we are not so much making peace as we are accepting and confessing the Christ who is our peace. To be a member of the Church is to share Christ’s peace, however nervous or awkward we may feel. . .

“When we offer each other Christ’s peace we are doing no less than accepting the basis upon which we are gathered together. We recognise that we are here together not because we are friends or because we enjoy the chummy atmosphere, or because we have the same theological opinions, but because – and only because – we are one in Christ’s indestructible peace. That’s why we gather as church: to exchange the kiss of peace with strangers, to exchange the sign of our Lord’s victory in the face of all that assaults human community. . .

“When a French Dominican celebrated a family funeral after WWII he saw that the congregation was deeply divided. On one side of the aisle were those who had belonged to the Resistance and on the other those who had collaborated with the Nazis. He announced that the funeral Mass would not even begin until the kiss of peace had been exchanged. This was a wall that had to fall before it would have made any sense to pray together for the resurrection of their dead brother. Hanging onto alienation is mortal. It is, in the words of Ann Lamott, like drinking rat poison and then waiting for the rat to die.

“Jesus’ invitation to this table means his embrace of all the ways in which our communion is faulty, subverted or betrayed. Here, in bread and wine, he takes into his hands all our fear, betrayal, lies, cowardice, shame, pain, isolation, distances, silences, misunderstandings and disloyalties, saying, ‘This is my body, given for you’.

“Together we sing for joy that Christ comes, that he returns to our midst in the Eucharist, to strengthen us in our struggles, to share with us the burden of each day, to speak to us of peace when our minds are troubled, and to put the hope of eternal life in our hearts in that hour when our way seems to be entering the shadow of death. Here again we see that in spite of the barriers we have erected, the Eucharist is a sacrament of unity, joining us all in the same triumphant joy that the presence of the risen Lord gives to his Church. . .

“And so in this bread and wine, Christ is really present to us, even more present than we are to each other, more bodily. He is truly the embodied Word of God who pulls down every barrier. That’s what it means for him to say to us, ‘Peace be with you’. For him to be risen is, then, not just to be alive once more: it is to be the place of peace in whom we meet and are healed.”[4]

5.    We are the new temple, the dwelling place of God.
God resides in us, you and me!  Astonishing - even more astonishing than God deigning to dwell in the tabernacle and temple.  God present to the world in and through you and me.  This is the point of God’s subversive counter-revolution.  God dwelling in and with us on his new creation, glorified in and through us, his humanity, fully alive (as Irenaeus put it)!  Christ is gathering all things to himself (1:10) to order them in just this fashion.  This is God’s “eternal purpose,” that for which Christ died and God raised and exalted him “far above all rule and authority… and put all things under his feet” (1:21,22).  Think and pray on that and give glory to and worship God!


[1] Thomas Merton, The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton (ed. Patrick Hart, et al.; New York: New Directions Publishing, 1975), 308.
[2] Geoff Wichert at http://empireremixed.com/2011/06/08/vocabulary-of-shalom/#more-1009.
[3] Yoder Neufeld, Ephesians, 122.
[4] http://cruciality.wordpress.com/2009/07/24/christ-is-our-peace-a-reflection-on-ephesians-211%E2%80%9322/.